Completion Accounts vs Locked Box: Which Price Mechanism Suits Your Sale?
Agreeing a headline price is not the same as agreeing what lands in your bank account. Between the two sits the price mechanism — completion accounts or locked box — and it determines how much you actually receive, when you receive it, and how likely you are to end up in a dispute about it. It is one of the most consequential terms in a sale agreement, and one of the least understood by owners going to market for the first time.
Why the price mechanism matters
Most Australian private deals are struck on an enterprise value — a price for the business itself, assumed to be delivered with no surplus cash and no debt, and with a normal level of working capital. Reality rarely obliges. Cash moves, debt is drawn and repaid, and working capital swings between the day you shake hands and the day the deal completes.
The price mechanism is how the sale agreement deals with that movement. Two approaches dominate Australian private M&A: completion accounts, where the price is trued up after completion against an actual balance sheet, and locked box, where the price is fixed by reference to an earlier balance sheet and protected by promises about what does not leave the business in the meantime.
Key takeaway
The mechanism is not an accounting footnote. It decides who carries the economic risk of the business between the reference date and completion — and that is a commercial negotiation, not a technical one.
How completion accounts work
Under a completion accounts mechanism, the parties agree the enterprise value up front but leave the final price open. A balance sheet is prepared as at the completion date, and the price is adjusted against it — typically for cash, debt and working capital measured against an agreed target.
The process usually runs in three steps:
- An estimate is prepared shortly before completion, and cash changes hands on that basis.
- The final completion accounts are prepared after completion, within a timeframe set by the agreement.
- A true-up payment flows in whichever direction the final numbers require, unless the accounts are disputed.
The appeal for a buyer is accuracy: they pay for the business as it actually was on the day they took it. The cost is complexity, a longer tail, and a genuine risk of argument — because the true-up depends on accounting judgments that both sides have a financial reason to see differently.
How locked box works
A locked box works from the other direction. The parties pick a historical balance sheet — the reference accounts, as at the locked box date — and fix the equity price from it. There is no post-completion true-up. Economically, the buyer is treated as owning the business from the locked box date onwards, even though completion happens later.
That only works if the box is genuinely locked. The buyer’s protection is not an adjustment — it is a set of undertakings that value has not left the business for the seller’s benefit since the locked box date.
What counts as leakage
Leakage is value moving out of the target to the seller or seller-related parties after the locked box date. Typical examples a buyer will want captured and indemnified:
- Dividends or distributions — cash leaving the target for the seller’s benefit.
- Management fees to the seller group — value extraction unless ordinary course and expressly permitted.
- Related party payments above market rates — value transferred to seller-related parties.
- Transaction costs paid by the target — the seller’s costs of sale pushed onto the buyer.
- Sale bonuses paid by the target — the economic cost of the sale reducing buyer value.
- Debt forgiveness or asset transfers to the seller — assets or value removed from the target.
Permitted leakage
Not every payment is prohibited. Agreed dividends, ordinary salary, rent, management fees and specific transaction cost reimbursements can be carved out as permitted leakage — but the carve-outs must be specific, disclosed and, wherever possible, quantified. Sellers who leave this vague invite an argument they will usually lose.
The two mechanisms compared
The trade-off runs along a handful of axes, and where you land on each depends on the business rather than on any general rule.
Price certainty
Locked box gives higher certainty at signing — the price is usually fixed and known. With completion accounts, the final number is not known until the accounts are agreed, which may be weeks or months after completion.
Accuracy and buyer protection
Completion accounts are more accurate at completion, because an actual balance sheet is measured and the adjustment captures cash, debt and working capital movements directly. A locked box price is based on earlier accounts, so the buyer’s protection depends instead on the quality of due diligence, the warranties, the conduct-of-business covenants and the leakage indemnity.
Dispute risk and timing
Completion accounts carry higher dispute risk, because accounting judgments can be contested and the true-up drags the process on well past completion. Locked box removes the price calculation as a source of argument — though leakage claims can still be made after completion, so it is not dispute-free.
Who tends to prefer which
Sellers often favour locked box: the price is fixed, the exit is clean, and there is no post-completion accounts process to manage. Buyers often favour completion accounts where trading or working capital is volatile. But the preference reverses often enough to be worth testing — locked box can suit a buyer well in a competitive auction, or where diligence access has been strong and the leakage controls are tight.
Which mechanism suits your sale?
There is no universal answer. Completion accounts are often more accurate but more complex. Locked box is often cleaner and more certain, but it requires real confidence in the reference accounts and in the leakage protections.
As a starting point, completion accounts tend to suit volatile businesses, carve-outs from a larger group, businesses with weaker accounting records, and deals with a long gap between signing and completion. Locked box tends to suit stable businesses with reliable, well-prepared accounts and a diligence process that has given the buyer proper access.
Which is to say: the quality of your accounts is itself a negotiating asset. A seller who wants the certainty of a locked box needs reference accounts a buyer will accept without discount.
Two traps worth avoiding
Accounting policy conflicts. Completion accounts disputes frequently arise because the agreement requires the accounts to be prepared under accounting standards and consistently with past practice — two requirements that can pull in opposite directions. A clear order of precedence is essential, not optional.
Broad permitted leakage. A loosely drafted permitted leakage definition can quietly undermine the buyer’s entire locked box protection. Specificity protects both sides — the buyer from surprises, the seller from a claim.
Questions to ask before you sign
Whichever mechanism the agreement uses, these are the points to press your advisors on before the document is final.
Quick reference
- Accounting hierarchy — what order applies between agreement-specific rules, the reference accounts, accounting standards and past practice?
- Pro forma statement — is there a schedule showing the exact calculation? Detail here reduces dispute risk.
- Estimate at completion — who prepares it, and can the other party challenge it? This determines cash paid on the day.
- Final accounts process — who prepares them, by when, and what documents must be provided?
- Dispute mechanism — independent accountant, expert determination or arbitration?
- Locked box date — are the reference accounts reliable, and are they audited?
- Leakage — what is prohibited, and what is permitted? Is permitted leakage quantified?
- Conduct of business — must the seller operate in the ordinary course before completion?
- Security or escrow — is any amount held back against an adjustment or a leakage claim?
Free guide: Locked Box Accounts in Australian M&A
Our plain-English guide goes deeper on locked box pricing — the legal features, the accounting issues, a worked example, and a fuller comparison against completion accounts.
Need Help?
This article provides general information and should not be considered legal, financial or tax advice. For personalised guidance, please contact the M&A advisory team at Quinn M&A by calling 1300 QUINNS (1300 784 667) or +61 2 9223 9166, or submit an online enquiry form to arrange an appointment.


